Re: internet kablowy w domu - Grupy dyskusyjne w eGospodarka.pl

eGospodarka.pl › Nieruchomości › Grupy › pl.misc.budowanie › internet kablowy w domu › Re: internet kablowy w domu

X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6201:: with SMTP id g1mr18654785otj.181.1592936831411; Tue,
23 Jun 2020 11:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6201:: with SMTP id g1mr18654785otj.181.1592936831411; Tue,
23 Jun 2020 11:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: news-archive.icm.edu.pl!news.icm.edu.pl!newsfeed.pionier.net.pl!news.samoylyk.n
et!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.
160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google
-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: pl.misc.budowanie
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 11:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s...@f...lasek.waw.pl>
Complaints-To: g...@g...com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.77.110.106;
posting-account=jnRHMAoAAACB5EawItMhNTZMy_yOF2XE
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.77.110.106
References: <5eee52be$0$510$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<5eee52be$0$510$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<a...@n...neostrada.pl>
<5eef3cc2$0$548$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<a...@n...neostrada.pl>
<5eefc908$0$539$65785112@news.neostrada.pl>
<a...@n...neostrada.pl>
<rct26i$vit$3@news.icm.edu.pl> <20200623172301.0b68b5f8@mateusz>
<s...@f...lasek.waw.pl>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <3...@g...com>
Subject: Re: internet kablowy w domu
From: s...@g...com
Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 18:27:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news-archive.icm.edu.pl pl.misc.budowanie:564483
[ ukryj nagłówki ]
W dniu wtorek, 23 czerwca 2020 11:45:56 UTC-5 użytkownik Jarosław Sokołowski napisał:
> Pan Mateusz Viste napisał:
>
>
> U mnie w tej chwili na LTE jest 26 ms, a na ADSL 20 ms. Ale mogłoby
> być odwrotnie. Przy okazji ciekawostka, apropos 8.8.8.8, do którego
> "zewsząd blisko":
>
> $ ping 1.1.1.1
> PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=0.757 ms
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=0.771 ms
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=0.860 ms
> 64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=0.780 ms
>
> Komputer w Warszawie. Jakby kto nie wiedział, 1.1.1.1 to taki młodszy
> brat 8.8.8.8, poniekąd konkurencyjny.
>

Zalezy gdzie sie siedzi:

64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=27.0 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=119 time=25.6 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=119 time=23.0 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=119 time=23.1 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=5 ttl=119 time=22.9 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=6 ttl=119 time=23.4 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=7 ttl=119 time=23.5 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=8 ttl=119 time=23.3 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=9 ttl=119 time=27.6 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=10 ttl=119 time=26.1 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=11 ttl=119 time=23.0 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=12 ttl=119 time=31.5 ms

64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=32.9 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=31.6 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=28.5 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=29.2 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=60 time=28.8 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=60 time=29.0 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=60 time=28.7 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=60 time=29.3 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=60 time=28.6 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=60 time=28.5 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=60 time=28.2 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=60 time=29.0 ms